Brooklyn Law School, Spring, 1985, 51 Brooklyn L. Rev. 479, 9726 words, The Second Circuit Review – 1983-1984 Term: Part I: Forward: Summary Orders In The Second Circuit Under Rule 0.23, George C. Pratt*. See Footnote 38, Thomas F. Liotti, Caution Urged on Trimming, Opinions, New York Law Journal, April 11, 1983 at 2, col. 6 (Letter to the Editor). *Judge Pratt is a former Second Circuit Judge.

Fordham University School of Law, Fordham International Law Journal, March, 1999, 22 Fordham Int’l. L.J. 1064, 25750 words, Comment: U.S. - Mexican Extradition Policy: Were The Predictions Right About Alvarez?, Argiro Kosmetatos. See Footnotes 119 and 159, Thomas F Liotti, Alvarez-Machain Was A Vote For Anarchy, National Law Journal, August 24, 1992, col. 3. (Cautioning that by condoning kidnaping of Mexican citizen, U.S. Supreme Court has declared open season on U.S. residents and citizens by foreign countries.

Fordham University School of Law, Fordham Urban Law Journal, Spring, 1996, 23 Fordham Urb. L.J. 709, 5740 words, Symposium: A Perspective On “Temper In The Court: A Forum On Judicial Civility,” Norman L. Greene. See Footnote 21, Letter from Thomas F. Liotti to the Editor, New York Law Journal, April 4, 1996 at 2, Why Do We Not Hear Calls For Removal When a Judge Unfairly Attacks a Defense Lawyer? The Reason is Clear. It Is Not Politically Correct.

Iowa University, Iowa Law Review, March, 1994, 79 Iowa L. Rev. 485, 70164 words, Article: Judicial Schizophrenia In Shareholder Voting Cases, Dale A. Oesterle and Alan R. Palmiter.

New York University Law Review, October, 1996, 71 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1067, 31558 words, Note: Wisdom Without Power: The Department Of Justice’s Attempt To Exempt Federal Prosecutors From State No-Contact Rules, Todd S. Schulman. See Footnote 43, Letter from Thomas F. Liotti, Attorney at Law, to President William Clinton (August 23, 1993) on file with the New York University Law Review, objecting to positions expressed in Reno Rule and suggesting that defense attorneys will mount an “avalanche of litigation” and will not “submit to allowing Government attorneys into the defense cam” and a Letter from New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers to the Office of the Association Attorney General (March 21, 1994) (on file with the New York University Law Review), asserting that members of the Association will report any violation of no-contact rule by New York licensed federal prosecutors because, notwithstanding Reno Rule, Association members are bound to do so.

Northwestern University Law Review, Summer, 1992, 86 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1103, 18383 words, Comment: Operation Clean Sweep: Is the Chicago Housing Authority ‘Sweeping’ Away the Fourth Amendment?, Steven Yarosh. See Footnote 169, Thomas F. Liotti, War On Drugs: At What Cost To Our Liberty?, New York Law Journal February 28, 1990 at 2. (“The forecast is not good for our civil rights and liberties. It is predicted that the war on drugs...will eventually erode the [C]onstitution in favor of some higher purpose which they claim takes precedence over individual liberties.”).

Ohio Northern University Law Review, 1993, 20 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 191, 7546 words, United States v. Alvarez-Machain: International Abductions: The Court’s Invitation for Reciprocal Action Against American Citizens.

St. John’s Law Review, Spring, 1996, 70 St. John’s L. Rev. 421, 8445 words, Penal Law: Penal Law Section 65.10: New York Court of Appeals Holds That Probation Condition Requiring “Convicted DWI” Sign on License Plate Was Penalty Not Reasonably Related To Probation, Dana Wordes. See Footnote 23, Thomas F. Liotti, “‘Scarlet Letter’ Sentenced Criticized,” New York Law Journal, July 20, 1994 at 2. (President of New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers criticizing 2nd Dept. decision with rationale used by Court of Appeals majority).

University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Law Review, September, 1992/October, 1992, 1992 Wis. L. Rev. 1697, 15457 words, Note: Harnelin v. Michigan: Is Proportionate Sentencing Merely Legislative Grace?, Kelly A. Patch. See Footnote 149, Thomas F. Liotti, War On Drugs: At What Cost To Our Liberty?, New York Law Journal, February 28, 1990 at 2. (“It is predicted that the War on Drugs, coupled with the pre-disposition of prosecutors and a Reagan/Bush Supreme Court, will eventually erode the Constitution in favor of some higher purpose which they claim takes precedence over individual liberties.”).

University of Cincinnati Law Review, University of Cincinnati, Spring, 1998, 66 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1045, 16568 words. See Footnote 19 & 20. Casenote: Pretextual Arrests: The Ninth Circuit Invades The Home In United States v. Hudson, 100 F.3d 1409 (9th Cir. 1996), Richard J. Schaen; Footnote 36 of Copyright (c) 1996 Michigan Law Review, Michigan Law Review, August 1996, 94 Mich. L. Rev. 2553, 21633 Words, Article: Computers, Urinals, and the Fourth Amendment: Confessions of A Patron Saint, Wayne R. LaFave. Professor LaFave is the David C. Baum Professor of Law Emeritus and Center for Advanced Study Professor of Law Emeritus at the University of Michigan School of Law.

Thomas F. Liotti, Closing The Courtroom To The Public: Whose Rights Are Violated? Brooklyn Law Review, Summer, 1997, 63 Brooklyn L. Rev. 501-506. This article analyzes the balance of First Amendment (access to the courtroom) and Fifth Amendment (right of confrontation) and Sixth Amendment (right to counsel) issues. The article addresses the circumstances under which the public and the press may be excluded from the courtroom. It also analyzes the legal impact of law enforcement witnesses testifying behind screens or otherwise not disclosing their identities to the defendant, his counsel, the audience in the courtroom or the press. Copyright (c) Brooklyn Law School 1997 Brooklyn Law Review Summer, 1997, 63 Brooklyn L. Rev. 501, 25061 words, The Second Circuit Review: 1996-97 Term. See Who's Who, The Attorney of Nassau County, March, 1998 at 2.

Thomas F. Liotti, Annual Survey of Penal Law, Syracuse Law Review, 1996-'97 Survey of New York Law, Volume 48, Number 2, 1998 at pp. 781-791.
Thomas F. Liotti, Does Gideon Still Make a Difference? New York City Law Review, Edited by the students of The City University of New York School of Law, a Journal of Law in the Service of Human Needs, Volume Two, Summer, 1998, Number Two, pp. 105-137. See Ellen S. Podgor, Reviews In Review, Gideon in New York, The Champion, a publication of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, June, 1999 at 48. This is a review of Mr. Liotti's Law Review article by Prof. Podgor of the Georgia State University College of Law.

Thomas F. Liotti, Annual Survey of Penal Law, Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 1999 at pp. 665-677.

Thomas F. Liotti and Christopher Zeh, Uneven Playing Field: Ethical Disparities Between The Prosecution And Defense Functions In Criminal Cases, Touro Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, Winter 2001 at pp. 467-501.

Thomas F. Liotti, The Uneven Playing Field, Part III, Or What’s On The Discovery Channel, St. John’s Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, Winter 2003, pp. 67-74.